Optional analytics and marketing cookies stay off unless you allow them. Cookie policy · Privacy policy
You should not have to buy a quarter of delivery to find out whether a firm is any good. Two of the six engagements are fixed in scope before they start, which makes either of them a complete piece of work and a short way to find out how we operate.
4-6 weeks · Priced Outcome
Turn a prototype, stalled build or inherited codebase into a tested, deployable foundation.
You getRisk and dependency triage, tests, CI and a deployable build, and a prioritized handover document.
4-8 weeks · 2-3 specialists · Priced Outcome
Claude, OpenAI, Gemini or whichever model fits, wired into a workflow people already use. Vendor choice follows the outcome, not a partnership badge.
You getModel selection and an evaluation harness, a cost ceiling with approval gates, and production rollout with monitoring.
Both engagements are quoted after we have read the code or the use case, not before. What is in and what is out is written down while you can still say no.
Four to eight weeks is long enough to ship something real and short enough that being wrong about us is survivable.
A deployable build or a production integration, in your repository, documented. Not a report and a proposal for the real work.
Most clients do continue, into a pod or Product Care. That is a decision made after the work rather than a condition of starting it.
It is retired. It existed to make a large, vague engagement feel small, and the six engagements are no longer vague: each names its scope and window, and all six are priced the same way, with the work and its cost written down for approval before anything starts. The two fixed-scope sprints do the same job without being a separate product.
If you have working software that you do not trust, a Vibe Code Rescue Sprint. If you have a live product and a defined AI use case that has to reach production, an AI Integration Sprint. If neither description fits, the intro call is a faster way to find out than reading both pages.
Like every other engagement: Priced Outcome. Start with a free initial audit. We assess the scope, the stage the application is at, the condition of the codebase, the team the work needs and how it runs in production, then set out the proposed work and its cost upfront for your approval before delivery begins. For a rescue sprint the audit reads the repository first, because fixing a price before looking is how a rescue turns into an open-ended bill. For an integration sprint it covers the use case and its accuracy, latency and cost requirements.
You find that out in the first week, in writing, rather than in the last one. The sprint still delivers what it was scoped to deliver, and what remains is described with the order to do it in, whether or not we do it.
Yes. The intro call costs nothing and is meant to leave you with a clearer problem whether or not you hire us, and the initial audit after it is free as well - you see the scope and the cost before you commit to a sprint at all. The ROI calculator is the other thing worth doing first, because it tells you what an outcome would have to be worth.
A named result, a fixed window and a scope agreed in writing before delivery starts.
Senior capacity inside your codebase, moving a roadmap week after week.
Monitoring, patching, upgrades and a named engineer for live software.
One agreed price for an agreed outcome, quoted after a free initial audit and approved before delivery begins.
Tell us what is unstable or what has to reach production. We will come back with which of the two fits and what it would be priced on.